Re: one frysk-core patch to add PPC64 testcases.

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Yong, so TestX8664 is failing.  Can you modify your patch so that, for 
the x86-64 case, it does the brokenXXX() thing (but do include the 
merged code), and then check it in?

Andrew

Yong Zheng wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 22:11 -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>   
> > Looking over the code I see you've inherited some older-nastier code.  
> > Rather than attempt to also fix that in parallel, can you check this in 
> > and then I'll sort out the old code's mess.
> >     
> During the new test on the patch based on the cvs head(08-28), we found
> one nasty bug on TestX8664Regs case. We have opened the bug(#3141):
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3141.
>
> Although the failed cases all pass after we do some modification on
> TestX8664Regs.java(the modificated TestX8664Regs.java can be got from
> the #1 reply in the above bug page), we are not sure the modification is
> proper or not. So we block the merging process. After the #3141 bug is
> fixed or the above modification is approved, we are very willing to
> resume it.  Thanks.
>
> Best Regards
> Yong Zheng 
>
>
>