Re: fix for bug 2969

[Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>]

Quoting Rick Moseley <rmoseley@redhat.com>:

> Looks good Yao.  I have applied the patch.  Thanks a lot.
>
> We will look into moving the tests from core around or fixing them some
> other way.

Hi Rick,

Did you work out any available ways right now?  In our opinion, it is  
easiest to merge these libunwind dependent code into a same directory,  
to say, frysk-imports/lib/unwind.

In this way, you can continue to do anything you like on x86 and  
x86_64. and don't impact the building of frysk on ppc64.

And I also believe it is easy to re-arrange these code when libunwind  
is ready for ppc64.

What is your thought?  Eager to know your thought on this.

> Rick
>
> Yao Qi wrote:
> > libunwind is not supported on ppc/ppc64, so libuwind and its java
> > bindings could be skipped when build frysk on ppc/ppc64.
> >
> > 2006-07-31  Yao Qi  <qiyaoltc@cn.ibm.com>
> >
> > 	* frysk-imports/bootstrap.sh: Build libunwind if it is supported.
> >
> > Run bootstrap.sh on X86 and PPC64 to verify its output(Makefile.gen),
> > and libunwind and its java bindings are only built on X86.
> >
> > OK to apply?  Thanks.

Regards
- Wu Zhou