This is the mail archive of the
frysk@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the frysk project.
Re: utrace in rawhide
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc at cn dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, frysk at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: utrace in rawhide
> Thanks for these information. They explained well why I can't get my
> ppc64 box boot up. :-) I had also a test with the yesterday's kernel
> build and had no luck yet. One guy named DaveJ said that it might be
> the problem of mkinitrd. I hope that it will be fixed soon.
Same for me. :-(
> Using these kernel, I can boot up x86. But the scripts/mod/modpost
> reports a "float point exception" when trying to build crash_suspend.o
> into a kernel module. I am trying to use modpost in other kernel
> build, but with no luck too.
Check dmesg for errors. These are things to report in a kernel bugzilla,
not to discuss in detail here.
> Good idea. If I find any failure/difference, I will try to reduce
> that to a small reproducible testcase.
That's very much appreciated.
> > The gdb test suite is the most thorough and moderately torturous test of
> > ptrace (and by extension, all my new utrace infrastructure code) I know of.
> > I've just written up detailed instructions for the folks doing new utrace
> > arch support, on setting up and running it, comparing the results, and
> > doing all the myriad biarch variations that can be tested. If you get to
> > the stage of wanting to run the hard tests and scour painfully for the
> > obscure problems, I can send you the same details.
>
> I would like to. Can you send me these detail? Thanks.
I will.
> I had a ppc32 machine available. But I am not sure if I can squeeze
> some time to run test on it. If time/resource is available, I will
> have a test on that.
Great. The rawhide ppc kernel should be easy enough to test with, modulo
the rawhide kernel being impossible to test with. ;-)
Thanks,
Roland