This is the mail archive of the
elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
mailing list for the elfutils project.
Re: [PATCH] backends (*_return_value_location): call dwarf_peeled_die_type
- From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- To: elfutils-devel at lists dot fedorahosted dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 23:40:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] backends (*_return_value_location): call dwarf_peeled_die_type
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 23:15 +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> ... instead of inlining equivalent code.
I didn't know we had that already. I was just contemplating whether to
add something like that. It also gets rid of the DW_TAG_mutable_type
issue (and in a nicer way than I did).
> +2014-06-20 Petr Machata <pmachata@redhat.com>
> +
> + * alpha_retval.c (alpha_return_value_location): Call
> + dwarf_peeled_die_type instead of inlining equivalent code.
> + * arm_retval.c (arm_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * i386_retval.c (i386_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * ia64_retval.c (ia64_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * ppc64_retval.c (ppc64_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * ppc_retval.c (ppc_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * s390_retval.c (s390_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * sh_retval.c (sh_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * sparc_retval.c (sparc_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * tilegx_retval.c (tilegx_return_value_location): Likewise.
> + * x86_64_retval.c (x86_64_return_value_location): Likewise.
Looks good. I'll rebase and push my 'Remove non-existing
DW_TAG_mutable_type' patch after this goes in.
Thanks,
Mark