This is the mail archive of the
elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
mailing list for the elfutils project.
Re: dwfl_module_addrinfo and @plt entries
- From: Milian Wolff <mail at milianw dot de>
- To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- Cc: elfutils-devel at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:28:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: dwfl_module_addrinfo and @plt entries
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <4389913.7LHyNoxDn3@agathebauer> <20170104134223.GN2187@stream>
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:42:23 PM CET Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:41:26AM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > how do I get symbol information for @plt entries?
>
> Short answer. You cannot with the dwfl_module_getsym/addr*
> functions. And we don't have accessors for "fake" symbols
> (yet). Sorry.
Thanks for the clarification Mark.
> Longer answer. An address pointing into the PLT does
> really point to an ELF symbol.
You mean: does _not_
Right?
> The PLT/GOT contains entries
> that are architecture specific "jump targets" that contain
> (self-modifying) code/data on first access. A PLT entry
> is code that sets up the correct (absolute) address of
> a function on first access. And on second access it fetches
> that function address and jumps to it. Since this is
> architecture specific we would need a backend function
> that translates an address pointing into the PLT into
> an actual function address. You would then be able to
> fetch the actual ELF symbol that address is associated
> with.
>
> If we have such a backend function then we could even
> do what BFD apparently does. Which is to then create a
> "fake" symbol with as name real_function@plt. But I am
> not sure such fake symbols are very useful (and will
> quickly become confusing since they aren't real ELF
> symbols).
So the objdump command I used is leveraging BFD internally to give me the @plt
names? I noticed that I also see @plt in perf, which is also probably using
BFD internally. That at least clarifies why it works in some tools but not in
when using dwfl.
> Hope that helps. And maybe inspires someone (you?) to
> write up such a backend function and corresponding
> dwfl frontend function.
It does help, thanks. I'm interested in contributing such functionality, but,
sadly, I'm not sure when I'll get the time to actually do it.
Cheers
--
Milian Wolff
mail@milianw.de
http://milianw.de