This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001142] User defined linker sections.
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:43:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug 1001142] User defined linker sections.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001142-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142
--- Comment #13 from Ilija Kocho <ilijak@siva.com.mk> 2011-02-14 13:43:15 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
>
> > I introduced them because of properties of CPP concatenation ## with respect to
> > argument prescan.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Argument-Prescan.html#Argument-Prescan
> > They are needed if "_name_" is a macro:
> >
> > #define FOO "foo"
> > USER_SECTION(FOO, reg, vma, lma)
> >
> > Example use case is when the section name is provided via CDL.
> > I would keep them but we may consider more suitable names.
>
> Ilija, thank you for the clarification. I now agree that we should keep them.
> Perhaps they could be renamed to CYG_USER_SECTION_START() and
> CYG_USER_SECTION_END() to reduce the possibility of a naming clash?
John, I take that you are more qualified than me for avoidance of naming clash
so I would accept your choice.
Just one note: The products of these macros can also be useful for application
(zeroing the section or so). Is it possible (and desirable) to place them
somewhere else where they will be available to both cortexm.ld and user?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.