This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
question on eCos mutex behavior
- From: "David Hill" <DHill at airdefense dot net>
- To: <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:20:58 -0400
- Subject: [ECOS] question on eCos mutex behavior
Hi.
I'm experiencing some unexpected behavior using mutexes under eCos and I'm wondering if this is just the way it works or if I might be missing something.? I created a simple test case below to illustrate the behavior - I have two threads that are both running at the same priority and always trying to get a mutex lock.? The only difference between them is that I guaranteed that the first would win the first time by inserting an artificial delay into the 2nd thread. I expected that when the 1st thread unlocks the mutex, and tries to take it again, the cyg_mutex_lock() function would hang because there is already another thread pending on that mutex.? However, what I'm seeing is that the 1st thread continues to succeed over and over again and the 2nd thread gets starved, so I see lots of "LOCK0" statements and no "LOCK1" statements.? If I uncomment the 'cyg_thread_delay(1)' statement after the mutex is unlocked, then I get the nice ping-pong effect I was expecting, but I can't really use that workaround for my application.
If this is expected behavior, then is there a different mutual exclusion primitive that will provide ordering?
If this is unexpected behavior, then are there some kernel parameters that might explain this?
Thanks,
Dave Hill
AirDefense, Inc.
static cyg_mutex_t???????? TestMutex;
static void testthread(cyg_addrword_t param)
{
??? if (param == 0)
??? {
??????? cyg_mutex_init(&TestMutex) ;
??? }
??? else
??? {
??????? cyg_thread_delay(50);
??? }
??? while (cyg_mutex_lock(&TestMutex) == true)
??? {
??????? diag_printf("LOCK%d\n", (int)param);
??????? cyg_thread_delay(100);
??????? cyg_mutex_unlock(&TestMutex);
//??????? cyg_thread_delay(1);
??? }
}
static void startTestThread(int num, uint8_t *stack,
??????????????????????????? uint16_t stacksize, cyg_thread *threadData)
{
??? cyg_handle_t handle;
??? cyg_thread_create(10,
????????????????????? testthread,
????????????????????? num,
????????????????????? "tt",
????????????????????? stack,
????????????????????? stacksize,
????????????????????? &handle,
????????????????????? threadData);
??? cyg_thread_resume(handle);
}
static void cliTestMutexCmd(int socket, CLI_INPUT *in)
{
??? static uint8_t stack1[1024];
??? static uint8_t stack2[1024];
??? static cyg_thread thread1;
??? static cyg_thread thread2;
??? startTestThread(0, stack1, 1024, &thread1);
??? startTestThread(1, stack2, 1024, &thread2);
}
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss