This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does ethernet driver "deliver" method need to be re-entrant?

From: Grant Edwards <grante at visi dot com>
To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [ECOS] Re: Does ethernet driver "deliver" method need to be re-entrant?
References: <euov4r$b3u$2@sea.gmane.org> <eutp1s$oul$2@sea.gmane.org> <461269A0.3050006@mlbassoc.com>

On 2007-04-03, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:

> There is no expectation for any of the ethernet driver functions
> to be reentrant.  Serialization is handled by the other layers
> that call these functions.

Thanks.  That's what I thought, but I wasn't sure I had
correctly found my way throught he network stack.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  Vote for ME
                                  at               -- I'm well-tapered,
                               visi.com            half-cocked, ill-conceived
                                                   and TAX-DEFERRED!


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Does ethernet driver "deliver" method need to be re-entrant?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: Does ethernet driver "deliver" method need to be re-entrant?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: Re: Does ethernet driver "deliver" method need to be re-entrant?
  - From: Gary Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]