Re: [ECOS] Re: AT91RM9200-EK Port

[Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:53:51AM +0200, John Eigelaar wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:19:59 +1000, stewart hamilton wrote:
> 
> > Hi John
> > 
> > I know its early days yet.  But as we are just about to embark on an 
> > evaluation of ecos on the
> > AT91RM9200-EK board and have no previous ecos experience, was wondering how 
> > your port to this board is going
> > 
> > Regards
> > Stewart
> 
> Stewart,
> 
> I haven't actually started yet. I have spent the last two days inspecting
> the ARM HAL structure. The AT91RM9200 present a bit of a conundrum - it is
> a an at91 part as well as an arm9 part. At this point I am not sure
> whether to start it as an at91 variant and use the stuff from the arm9 HAL
> as well, or start with an arm9 platfrom and just use the at91 variants a e
> reference. At this point in time I am leaning towards the arm9 starting
> point just because stuff like cahces and MMU controllers has already been
> used in these platforms.

I beleave eCosCentric have already a port for the AT91RM9200. Maybe
they could share there experiance. Did they use the at91 var or the
arm9 var? 

        Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss