This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
[docbook-apps] admon graphics: GIF vs PNG
- From: Mike Mueller <linux-support at earthlink dot net>
- To: DocBook-Apps <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:04:54 -0400
- Subject: [docbook-apps] admon graphics: GIF vs PNG
I am using openjade on sgml source on a Debian stable system.
The admon graphics won't come out unless I use .gif graphics. GIF is bad,
PNG is good, correct? Patent issues and what-not.
Googling tells me that there is some way to change DSSSL to override the .gif
extensions for admons
(http://developers.cogentrts.com/cogent/prepdoc/pd-customizingthedssslstylesheets.html,
search page for "override"). Most of what I am reading on the web is over my
head.
Questions:
1. I've got admons working with .gifs. Should I just move on or should I
work to rid my docs of .gifs? What's the right thing to do?
2. If I should use the .pngs, then is there a recipe for modifying the DSSSL?
3. If .gifs are bad then why no .png equivalents in the
docbook-dsssl-1.77/images directory? And why is the default admon image
format GIF?
4. Do xml tools handle the .png admons out-of-the-box?
5. Are .png files for admons and callouts available or do they have to be
converted using gimp for example?
6. OT: Is it socially acceptable to be using openjade and sgml these days?
I appreciate any and all help or opinions. Thanks.
--
Mike Mueller
Registration No. 324881 (08/20/2003)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org