This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] Multiple processing document with exsl:node-set and xsltproc
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat dot com>
- To: Patrick Eisenacher <eisenacher at fillmore-labs dot com>
- Cc: Vitaly Ostanin <vyt at vzljot dot ru>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 05:06:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Multiple processing document with exsl:node-set and xsltproc
- References: <20030810202111.5170b784.vyt@vzljot.ru> <3F3758A9.10901@fillmore-labs.com>
- Reply-to: veillard at redhat dot com
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:49:45AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> this sounds like you're experiencing the same problems like I did with
> profiling. In short, ids get lost when doing profiling with xsltproc. It
> seems that the specification on how to do this properly is at fault, not
> xsltproc, though. Currently, you can only do 2-step-profiling with xsltproc.
>
> Check this thread for more details:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook/2003-07/msg00177.html
Well do the maintainers expect to fix the stylesheets or feel fine
keeping code based un undefined behaviour ? This sounds insane to
just copy full subtree of the documents to then look for keys in
a copy of the given set ... Can't profiling be done without copying
to a new subtree ???
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org