This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: DSSSL or XSL? Which tools?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: Joachim Ziegler <ziegler at algorilla dot de>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:46:52 -0400
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DSSSL or XSL? Which tools?
- References: <200209261442.47897.ziegler@algorilla.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Joachim Ziegler <ziegler@algorilla.de> was heard to say:
| i've finally produced my first DocBook document. now i want to transform it
| into nice looking pdf. the output must be of high qualitiy because someday it
| will go into print.
|
| what's more worth learning: DSSSL or XSL? (i haven't experience in either and,
| like always, not much time)
|
| which (freeley available) tools achieve the output of highest quality?
High quality print is a problem in either case, but it's a more
significant problem with XSL at the moment. That said, almost
everything else about XSL is a step forward.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No man is more than another if he
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | does no more than
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | another.--Cervantes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9k5xsOyltUcwYWjsRAugLAJ9HjFNnJiNBynfpmoSdC3ix6PjTEACeMsA9
68kMzPXlki6/8QoyVeglyJg=
=3aPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----