This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML
- From: Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:28:34 +0000
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML
- References: <20011221001441.K51511@clan.nothing-going-on.org><87u1twa5c4.fsf@nwalsh.com> <"from ndw"@nwalsh.com><20020109034014.Y30356@redhat.com>
--tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:40:14AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no
> direct=20
> DocBook XML -> TeX
> transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the
> semantic is lost and only content/formatting is left, where then TeX
> is generated.
If you mean via PassiveTeX, it doesn't really produce any actual TeX.
Tim.
*/
--tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8PA1ByaXy9qA00+cRAkScAJ4mgOLXd+G8Ptg0YULpGb9xKi3f6wCeJDJG
dnknS4LvCdroZ0lWWBY8ewI=
=kfLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa--