Re: Fwd: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

[Marco Atzeri <marco dot atzeri at gmail dot com>]

Am 29.01.2020 um 16:39 schrieb Hans-Bernhard Bröker:
> [Ooops, sent this to Takashi instead of the list, originally.]
>
> Am 29.01.2020 um 14:46 schrieb Takashi Yano:
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> > > As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing
> > > a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing
> > > a latent bug or race.



> Note that fp->_seek64 is actually null, so this is calling a null 
> pointer, possibly caused by gnulib interfering with the call sequence?

or applying the wrong sequence to a Posix system, that portion of Octave
is built using gnulib submodules. It seems the new build are taking the
wrong pieces.

Thank to both for your efforts
Marco



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple