This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 03/04/2017 17:07, cyg Simple wrote:
On 4/3/2017 11:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:On 03/04/2017 16:53, cyg Simple wrote:The file is lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz 32 bytes with no contents. I've tried two different mirrors. There are also no dependencies applied. Reverting back to lapack-3.6.1-1.tar.xz proves that it is empty as well with the same no dependency rules.source only. all the contents is in: $ cygcheck -cd |grep lapack liblapack-devel 3.7.0-1 liblapack-doc 3.7.0-1 liblapack0 3.7.0-1Then these should be installed dependents of the chosen lapack. Source only means nothing when you can choose the binary download.
there are today no packages depending from lapack. I miss the relevance of your last comment; there are ~ 473 empty binary package in the distribution.Please note that lapack is empty but the debug file for the three binaries is called lapack-debuginfo anyway as the upstream source file
is called lapack. Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |