This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: From Microsoft: Windows 10 Console and Cygwin
- From: Rich Eizenhoefer <riche at microsoft dot com>
- To: "cygwin at cygwin dot com" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:23:00 +0000
- Subject: RE: From Microsoft: Windows 10 Console and Cygwin
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: cygwin.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
- References: <BN3PR03MB1430B88AED4339821C7D95BEB4D50 at BN3PR03MB1430 dot namprd03 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <20150502133833 dot GB12723 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <BN3PR03MB1430C0816A9D41BB051687A4B4D20 at BN3PR03MB1430 dot namprd03 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <1433098286892-118602 dot post at n5 dot nabble dot com> <20150601082456 dot GG4308 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <BN3PR03MB14303BAD46376DED807CFA2CB4B60 at BN3PR03MB1430 dot namprd03 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <CAJ1KOAiG-VV2heqYSNSjwCb=s_pjxoxKaGY3SnDiy4E20yvOWw at mail dot gmail dot com> <BN3PR03MB1430F49F8839B66558779F3AB4B50 at BN3PR03MB1430 dot namprd03 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <556E01FC dot 6060004 at redhat dot com> <CAB2911B-10C9-409F-B0A4-A88C3C9EB0BD at etr-usa dot com> <20150608114924 dot GA3005 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
We're hearing more and more need for something like this, not just a hidden console window but a proper bifurcation between a console server and client so to speak. I'll add the POSIX pty idea to our backlog for when we start reviewing the overall requests in this area.
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 4:49 AM
Cc: Rich Eizenhoefer
Subject: Re: From Microsoft: Windows 10 Console and Cygwin
On Jun 2 14:49, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Eric Blake <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On 06/02/2015 10:37 AM, Rich Eizenhoefer wrote:
> >> Can you provide more detail on changing isatty function to support Cygwin PTY's? I need to be able to support the request in our backlog.
> > As long as we are wishing, it would be awesome if Windows natively
> > supported ptys as actual objects, instead of making cygwin have to
> > emulate them on top of other objects.
> In my ignorance of how ptys map to Windows console objects, I held off from asking for this when Mr. Eizenhoefer solicited ideas, but this is what I thought of at that time, too.
> In other words, this notion of âvirtual terminalsâ is already implemented multiple times, following a standard that specifies the expected semantics â POSIX â so why not just do that?
> Why, in the end, can Windows *not* have ptys?
That's a good question.
Basically Windows console handles are kind of one half of the equation.
They don't follow the expected semantics but they are what native Windows tools know and expect.
Opening up the other half of the equation, the server side, without forcing to start conhost, might be enough to allow emulating POSIX ptys.
But I agree, real ptys with POSIX semantics would be cool.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com