Re: gnupg packaging bug?

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Mar  1 12:31, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 3/1/2015 11:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar  1 11:00, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >>On 2/28/2015 9:26 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>gnupg-1.4.19-1 depends on libusb0 (64-bit only).  I assume that happened
> >>>by accident.
> >>>
> >>>Ken
> 
> >>
> >>So the question is:
> >>- enable for both or disable for both ?
> >
> >I'd vote for enabling.
> >
> >
> >Corinna
> >
> 
> further checking I found that gnupg requires
> libusb-config but this seems present only in the
> 
> libusb-devel-1.2.6.0-2 - libusb-devel: USB library (deprecated 0.1 API)
> (installed binaries and support files)
> 
> and not in the new API version
> libusb1.0-devel	USB library
> 
> So it seems that gnupg 1.4x is looking for the deprecated 0.1 API,
> not sure it is really worth.

Out of curiosity I looked how Fedora is doing this.  It provides a
libusb-0.1 compatibility layer called "libusb" in version 0.1.x on top
of the real libusb called "libusbx" in version 1.0.x.

It also provides gnupg-1.4.18 linked against libusb-0.1.

And, this a rather unexpected surprise, its gnupg2 package or rather,
the gnupg2-smime module, is actually linked against... libusb-0.1!


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: pgpBJWjDJQPrZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature