This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.3
- From: Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa dot com>
- To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:38:15 -0700
- Subject: Re: TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.3
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150220102927 dot GR26084 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <6695-1424465180-282140 at sneakemail dot com> <20150223111721 dot GH437 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <9116-1424712152-918733 at sneakemail dot com> <20150223174709 dot GB26549 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAFrJEvNKjG6JSWk6w1HM2wtC-CEX_FJOYtsjaeY7o1XX2uWD=Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150223201119 dot GX437 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <801DB7C4-3F66-468F-B786-0C7575897D98 at etr-usa dot com> <154114676 dot 20150224063913 at yandex dot ru> <9D7B3952-86AD-4EA7-8146-E985ADE2FE4D at etr-usa dot com>
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Warren Young <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Andrey Repin <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> 2. Oh, its primary group is Warren, too, so letâs inherit g+rw, too.
>> Nop, this is actually an issue of reading ACLs rather than setting them.
>> POSIX access bits do not expect interchangeability of users and groups.
> So is âchgrp Noneâ the correct fix, or is there a better way to do it? Either way, this FAQ item needs improvement.
Oh, I should point out that various wild swings with the setfacl -b hammer also failed. I tried that before I resorted to the chgrp hack.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple