This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Writing to /dev/clipboard from multiple processes in Bash gives inconsistent behaviour
- From: "cyg Simple" <cygsimple at gmail dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:43:57 -0500
- Subject: RE: Writing to /dev/clipboard from multiple processes in Bash gives inconsistent behaviour
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150212134550 dot GC20741 at dinwoodie dot org> <20150212170342 dot GB7818 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <925263616 dot 20150213005102 at yandex dot ru> <20150213092339 dot GB17624 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <1083078655 dot 20150213130932 at yandex dot ru> <20150213105917 dot GE20741 at dinwoodie dot org> <02f801d0479f$e93c9c20$bbb5d460$ at gmail dot com> <20150213152551 dot GF20741 at dinwoodie dot org>
> From: Adam Dinwoodie
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:15:30AM -0500, cyg Simple wrote:
> > > From: Adam Dinwoodie
> > >
> > > In which case, I wonder if it's worth adding something to the
> > > FAQ/BLODA
> > about
> > > this? I guess not, at least until someone independently encounters
> > > this behaviour so it warrants the "F" as well as the "AQ".
> > >
> >
> > I find it strange that someone would be using /dev/clipboard for a
> > temporary buffer of data for a batch process anyway. Too many
> > opportunities for that data to be corrupted by other actions of the
> > user. So in other words, just don't do that; it isn't portable and it
> > is prone to error. The proper use would be for a user to store
> > content in /dev/clipboard that the user would then use immediately to
> > paste elsewhere. It should never be used for programmatic operation
> > where the operation is dependent on the result later; it wasn't designed
for
> that.
>
> I'm not sure what gave you the impression anyone was trying to use the
> clipboard as a buffer for a batch process. I can't see anyone using batch
at all,
> for that matter. (Or do you mean "shell" instead of "batch"? The two are
> different things.)
>
A shell command line can batch commands; a batched process doesn't require a
file.
> My original use case (as mentioned in my original email) was a `find`
command
> that `-exec`'d multiple times to produce output. That went to the
clipboard, for
> me to paste into a Windows application.
>
I would put the output to a /tmp/deleted.lst file and when I'm ready to
paste it into the mail I would cat /tmp/deleted.lst > /dev/clipboard.
> The shell code I posted was a simple test case to show the problem, not
actually
> what I'm trying to achieve. Posting simplified example code that
demonstrates
> a problem is a common way to get help because it means others only need to
> understand the simple example, not the full problem:
> https://cygwin.com/acronyms/#STC
By the design and purpose of the Windows Clipboard your use of
/dev/clipboard is flawed. You need to change your methods in order to fix
the issue.
--
cyg Simple
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple