This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Replicate packages from 32-bit machine on 64-bit machine
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:58:08 -0400
- Subject: Re: Replicate packages from 32-bit machine on 64-bit machine
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <loom dot 20140817T083657-868 at post dot gmane dot org> <1109698188 dot 20140818042530 at yandex dot ru> <loom dot 20140818T162457-896 at post dot gmane dot org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 08/18/2014 10:30 AM, Paul wrote:
Andrey Repin <anrdaemon <at> yandex.ru> writes:
>>When I wanted to replicate my cygwin installation from a 32-bit
>>machine to another 32-bit machine, it was straightforward. I would
>>simply reinstall all installed packages, but have the downloaded
>>packages got to a folder which I then burn to CD.
>>However, my next machine is a 64-bit machine. So I have to use the
>>64-bit setup. Is there an almost-as-painless way to replicate the
>>64-bit version of the packages that I have installed on my 32-bit
>You contradicting yourself. 64-bit packages are entirely different
>files than 32-bit packages.
Yes, I understand. I was referring to the 64-bit versions of my
32-bit packages. It took quite some period of discovery to determine
my operational needs and the packages required. I'm hoping to avoid
that re-experiencing that.
You shouldn't have allot of trouble matching the 64-bit version of any
package with the 32-bit version. Assuming there is a 64-bit version of
the package you want, package names are typically very similar between
the two architectures.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple