This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...)
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:09:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140409032833 dot GA2351 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <CAAXzdLUk3L3zRcGoLmb=GM-rnF7K8Y=fqNA8n9gfgVhja5TL2Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140409055117 dot GA1878 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <CAAXzdLXxAnB0JYHuvJj44ZAT=Uc-G12Xt+xsirnmiPBkOJ4U-w at mail dot gmail dot com> <53457A4C dot 1050104 at etr-usa dot com> <20140409170517 dot GA6319 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <53472600 dot 7050008 at lysator dot liu dot se> <20140411021742 dot GA6242 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <53479351 dot 4050703 at lysator dot liu dot se> <20140411121042 dot GB23281 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:10:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 11 09:01, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>The newlib license is liberal enough for RedHat to relicense it under
>>their own terms?
>That's it, more or less.
I have never seen how you can have it both ways, legally speaking. I
was told not to worry about it when I was at Red Hat but no one ever
gave me a convincing explanation. Since there are no assignments in
newlib land, it just relies on BSD-like licensing. I don't see why
Cygwin can't do the same.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple