This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: long_int vs int byte sizes
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin list <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: Joseph Maxwell <discard36 at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:49:39 +0200
- Subject: Re: long_int vs int byte sizes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABKp57PdLMKqmGFhfMEN4BLPFcndkpibora5yx2Xdy6zh4+WzA at mail dot gmail dot com> <6BA0E670DE2A4416BB5A12250B427E5A at OwnerPC311012>
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Rob wrote:
> I think so. I've not yet struck a case on Windows where either int or long
> are not 4 bytes. (Haven't tried Cygwin64.)
Obviously you never used a 16-bit compiler :)
(where int is 16 bits and long is 32 bits usually)
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple