This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cp vs copy performance over local network
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:10:27 -0400
- Subject: Re: cp vs copy performance over local network
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAJyLC6sbpLsGXpt2U8u1QOCw+7AhYuo73Q8e2V_K=fu7ujaKkg at mail dot gmail dot com> <52432BDB dot 7080809 at cygwin dot com> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C3F2F18 at MLBXv04 dot nih dot gov>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On 9/25/2013 3:45 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
There's overhead to handle POSIX permissions, etc.
For one file, the effects of copying the meta-data should be negligible.
You're right. I didn't really look at the example (1 file) and the timing
difference (~10 sec). I was assuming multiple files. strace output still
might provide some insight. Or perhaps as Andrey suggests, the x86_64
version might make up the difference.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple