This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: UNC and POSIX paths
- From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at freemail dot ru>
- To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:33:24 +0400
- Subject: Re: UNC and POSIX paths
- References: <kpn4kk$p88$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <036c01ce6b6d$0ada5090$208ef1b0$ at malth dot us> <kpnfp7$urd$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <03b201ce6b83$c5b62720$51227560$ at malth dot us> <51BF534E dot 2030200 at cygwin dot com> <044001ce6bca$16c79ef0$4456dcd0$ at malth dot us> <20130618044230 dot GA6062 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <048c01ce6be7$5aea3940$10beabc0$ at malth dot us> <20130618102632 dot GC27405 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130618143009 dot GA5406 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130618143644 dot GC5406 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx>
- Reply-to: Andrey Repin <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
Greetings, Christopher Faylor!
> And, it nontrivially complicates path handling since we'd have to make
> decisions about whether to honor // or not.
That's an easy decision: "//" should remain as Cygwin/POSIX equivalent of
"\\" AKA UNC path access.
If anyone want to argument against it with broken scripting examples, ...
I would question their sanity.
> If we do consider this, I think we should take a step back and think
> about revamping path handling to allow hooks for things like /dev,
> /proc, /cygdrive rather than having to special case them.
SHTDI, as you said... But it'd be interesting advancement in /etc/fstab
Andrey Repin (email@example.com) 19.06.2013, <02:29>
Sorry for my terrible english...
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple