On 11/16/2011 1:34 PM, viper_88 wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 11/15/2011 2:28 PM, viper_88 wrote:
The avalanche of my problems has started when I wanted to install
compat-libstdc++ 33-3.2.3. The installation failed due to the following
dependencies errors:
error: Failed dependencies:
/sbin/ldconfig is needed by compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6 is needed by compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
libm.so.6 is needed by compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-55.fc5
Hm. This looks to me like output of rpm or yum on a Linux system. If
you're trying to install Linux binary RPMs onto Cygwin, you're in for a
world of hurt. Cygwin != Linux. You need to build from source on Cygwin.
--
Larry
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Hello there, Larry, and thank you for your reply.
You were right, I indeed tried to install compat-libstdc++ using an RPM
file. I am still learning Cygwin, so I wasn't sure whether it supports
them
or not (and the RPM's were the first to pop when searching for any
sources).
It's not an issue of whether Cygwin supports RPMs. It's an issue of
trying to install a Linux executable on Cygwin. It doesn't matter
whether it's packaged in an RPM, it's still a Linux binary, not a Cygwin
binary.
It seems, however, that now I have faced a problem with GLIBC, which is
required to update GCC, that I won't be able to deal with (and I haven't
updated libstdc++ due to this yet)...
From the Cygwin FAQ (which I strongly recommend reading):
Where is glibc?
Cygwin does not provide glibc. It uses newlib instead, which provides
much (but not all) of the same functionality. Porting glibc to Cygwin
would be difficult.
THC-Hydra claims that it builds fine on Cygwin. Does it not?