This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: rebaseall and cygstdc++-6.dll


On 9/26/2011 5:15 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 02:15 +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
   The problem is in binutils, and the fact that it generates base relocs for
entries from EH data that should be just ignored.

   http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-09/msg00174.html
contains more detail, if you want to ask more let's do it on the binutils list.

   So to answer your question: the gcc language-specific runtime DLLs have to
be built using the patched version of binutils, otherwise they break when they
get rebased; that's why I'm rebuilding the gcc packages - having already
locally rebuilt binutils.  This will only be a big issue for anyone who wants
to rebuild gcc from source themselves, the new packages I upload to the distro
will still work for everyone regardless of what binutils they have installed
and/or how or when or where they get rebased.

Except that this issue doesn't affect only libstdc++, but any C++ library which throws exceptions (as I have seen on my system). So we really do need a patched binutils ASAP.


There is an easy way to identify such libraries ? Just to know if I need to rebuild some of mines .


Yaakov



Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]