This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
On 19 May 2011 19:04, kathy3826 <email@example.com> wrote:
> because there should be such command in unix einvironment,
it's not a standard command in any way. Some packages have scripts
named like this, but there isn't anything "standard" about it, really.
> so its equivalent
> or the same one
> should exist in cygwin?
> Csaba Raduly-2 wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, kathy3826 Âwrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> when i type mk_all command cygwin returns:
>>> -bash: mk_all: command not found
>> There is no Cygwin package which contains mk_all:
>> Why do you think typing mk_all would exist?
>> GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
>> The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
>> Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
>> "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus
>> "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds
>> Problem reports: Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>> FAQ: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/faq/
>> Documentation: Â Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>> Unsubscribe info: Â Â Âhttp://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/mk_all-tp31655700p31657287.html
> Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Problem reports: Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: Â Â Â Â http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: Â Â Âhttp://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
DISCLAIMER: Any text following this sentence does not constitute a
part of this message, and was added automatically during transmission.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple