This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: newlib and long-double question
The OP is trying to build Perl itself, not use it; hence the need for
long double support functions...
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Sisyphus <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "marco atzeri"
>>> On a Linux system that I have access to, I see that those functions
>>> are in /lib/libm.* but cygwin's /lib/libm.* still seems to lack them.
>>> Is there any work around or alternate version ofthis lib that actually
>>> has these functions. I honestly do not mean to be rude, but how
>>> difficult is it to impliment these functions which seem so common in
>>> most unix-like systems?
>> It is not overcomplicated to implement it, but it takes time and
>> someone to do it.
>> When I implemented all the complex functions (cabs, ccos..) I spent one
>> to make it right. A more capable guy will take less surely, but as
>> mention I see little
>> benefit moving from 64 to 80 bits so I was not interested to implement it.
> I sense an opportunity here to plug (to the op) the Math::MPFR perl module -
> for which the gmp and mpfr C libraries are required.
> I guess one could also use Math::BigFloat, but I assume the op has already
> considered (and rejected) that option - the performance hit incurred by its
> use has always discouraged me.
> Perhaps he has also already considered and rejected Math::MPFR, but it seems
> to me to be by far the best option for achieving added precision with
> floating point numbers - at least until such time as building perl with
> -Duselongdouble has been facilitated.
> Problem reports: ? ? ? http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: ? ? ? ? http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: ? ? ?http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple