This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: NTFS write-protect flag translation (tar? rsync?) only one-way?

On 4/5/2011 3:36 AM, Christian Gelinek wrote:
Hi everyone,

I have a problem with the tar command with the "extract permissions
information" option being set.

I am running Cygwin (CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 1.7.8(0.236/5/3) 2011-03-01 09:36)
under Windows 7 (Windows 7 Professional N Ver 6.1 Build 7600) with NTFS and
the CYGWIN=ntsec environment variable.

It appears that when tar reads files for adding to archives, it correctly
interprets the Windows-set "R" attribute, which is also seen by ls under
Cygwin. After extracting the files using tar though, only Cygwin's ls
command seems to be aware of the read-only attribute; the attrib command (as
well as Explorer and other Windows-apps) see and handle the file as being

The read-only attribute is a "Windows" thing. Cygwin's utilities focus on supporting POSIXy/Linuxy ways of doing things. You can't expect Cygwin's tools to manage all of Window's permission facilities in the same way as Windows does. The read-only flag is one case where you'll see a divergence. If you need that flag set, you'll need your own wrapper to set it based on the POSIX (or ACL) permissions. The read-only attribute really is quite anachronistic though IMO. It conflicts with the more powerful ACLs. If you have the option, it's better not to use that flag.



A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

-- Problem reports: FAQ: Documentation: Unsubscribe info:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]