This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: /dev/windows and select() [was Re: Slow response to keypresses in xorg-server-1.8.0-1]
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com, cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:50:41 +0200
- Subject: Re: /dev/windows and select() [was Re: Slow response to keypresses in xorg-server-1.8.0-1]
- References: <4BDC3161.9070101@cornell.edu> <4BDDE5F1.9080204@cornell.edu> <4C2B8171.5020409@dronecode.org.uk> <4C5B08AE.4080902@pobox.com> <AANLkTin9mOFFkk21dYf+CT2uMXr=x5bnaNsTkH0w0cka@mail.gmail.com> <4C5DD910.9050809@dronecode.org.uk> <AANLkTin6e74L1_Z7KzoOVmynQ+eW6a8tkTK_A21-mpg+@mail.gmail.com> <4C7A62FD.10506@dronecode.org.uk> <20100829141716.GG6726@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100829144150.GI6726@calimero.vinschen.de>
On Aug 29 16:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 29 16:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 29 14:39, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> > > On 08/08/2010 12:04, Andy Koppe wrote:
> > > >On 7 August 2010 23:07, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> > > >>Hmmm, looking again at the implementation of select(), I don't immediately
> > > >>see that when waiting on /dev/windows, it checks that the message queue has
> > > >>old messages on it before waiting. The MSDN documentation for
> > > >>MsgWaitForMultipleObjects() seems to says that messages which had arrived
> > > >>before the last PeekMessage() etc. aren't considered new and so don't end
> > > >>the wait?
> > > >[...]
> >
> > Thanks for the testcase. I examined this and I think I have a
> > workaround. MSDN states that there's a flag QS_ALLPOSTMESSAGE for
> > MsgWaitForMultipleObjects, which is not cleared by PeekMessage, if the
> > wMsgFilterMin and wMsgFilterMax arguments are not both 0. So, what I
> > did was to add the QS_ALLPOSTMESSAGE flag to the
> > MsgWaitForMultipleObjects call in select.cc, and to change the
> > PeekMessage call in select.cc:peek_windows() from
> >
> > PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 0, 0, PM_NOREMOVE)
> >
> > to
> >
> > PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 1, UINT_MAX, PM_NOREMOVE)
> >
> > Same in your above test application. This appears to do the trick.
> > However, I'm not exactly sure if that's a valid fix. Patch below.
>
> Hmm, this ignores the potential WM_NULL message, afaics. For some
> reason, using
>
> PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 0, UINT_MAX, PM_NOREMOVE)
>
> results in MsgWaitForMultipleObjects hanging, too. OTOH, using
>
> PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 0, 16, PM_NOREMOVE)
> && PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 17, UINT_MAX, PM_NOREMOVE)
>
> does not. Go figure.
Yeah, I realize I'm talking to myself, but this works, too:
PeekMessage (&m, (HWND) h, 0, UINT_MAX - 1, PM_NOREMOVE)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple