This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()
- From: "Christopher Wingert" <mailbox at wingert dot org>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 08:43:50 -0700
- Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()
- References: <20100605052429.GA4801@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
> Can't really parse that sentence.
Then load your English parser.
> I haven't detected any "picking on" but then I can't claim to have
> written the fhandler* code anymore Corinna has rewritten most of it. I
> do know that if you want to be taken seriously you really need to send a
> concrete suggestion/patch.
I don't know the right answer to the problem.
BUT... I have shown how to do achieve similar results to the dll, but with
significantly less overhead.
So... the person who cared to improve his/her/its code would say, "Well
we use NTOpenFile() because it does the blah blah extra functionality that
FindNextFile()/GetFileAttributes() do not." Then we could look to other
Win32 APIs to try to achieve those results.
For example opening a file on Windows for the purposes of stat()ing a file
is dumb, considering the way most Windows Virus Scanners work.
> So far, it seems to me that you're basically thinking out loud and
> expecting us to fill in the blanks. That's not an effective way to
> getting anything changed.
Yes, thinking out loud is an effective way for a team to work together.
You should try it....
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple