This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:06:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()
- References: <efe8a37b2e4466daa7b6eb1aa610c3d7.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> <20100530170747.GA8605@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <f460895a8fc53da26cb91259a4005da2.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org> <4C03D6C5.4050004@x-ray.at> <80373222dd5d43b134a5ede7036e7674.squirrel@www.webmail.wingert.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Jun 1 14:42, Christopher Wingert wrote:
> I think there are a lot of use cases where the extra information (ACL
> information *I assume* is the majority of the problem) is unnecessary.
> For most of the applications filename, size, and the three dates are all
> that is necessary. So cygwin stat is overkill. So if I can tell the
> emulation layer (via an environment flag) or the actually utility
> (bash/ls/make/find/du) via a command line switch, I think I can save a lot
> of time waiting.
>
> Just to highlight how bad this problem is. I have a network drive with
> 681 sub directories and approximately 90k files. A time comparison for
> getting directory information as follows:
>
> *DOS "dir /s" takes 17 seconds.
> *Cygwin "ls -lR" takes 5950 seconds (that's almost two hours).
> *msls -lR takes 55 seconds.
> *myls (see code below) takes 7 seconds.
>
> Each test was done twice and after a reboot to make sure there was no
> caching involved.
>
> To be clear, Cygwin ls is 850X slower.
Did you try to mount the network drive with the "noacl" mount option?
That skips requesting the owner/group information.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple