This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Hippo icon for cygwin...
On 2009-12-05 14:27Z, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Greg Chicares wrote:
>> Might this file:
>> 1a652c4c8c31b80c85d6cbc2b4093060 *hippo.ico
>> be somehow malformed? My computer BSODs every time I try to view
>> it in 'irfanview'. This has happened three times in a row.
> BSOD? Well, *any* BSOD is by definition a bug inside ring 0 (e.g. the
> core Windows kernel, or a graphics driver. So, it isn't *.ico's fault.
Yes, apparently it's an XP SP1 kernel defect: in 'win32.sys',
PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA, STOP 0x00000050.
I also tried the original .ico on an XP SP2 machine, which produced
a different BSOD. That machine was set to reboot itself upon BSOD,
so I didn't have time to record the message; but the program name
began with 'ati', so it was almost certainly a graphics driver.
But those are defects in ring-zero programs, so it's their job to
avoid crashing no matter what .ico file is handed to them. The
resulting vulnerability is their fault--not the .ico's fault.
BTW, both these machines have no known hardware problems, and
recent full runs of memtest86 indicate that their RAM is fine.
> Still, it'd be good to avoid...
>> I tried opening the icon file in gimp-2.2.4, which crashed with:
>> winicon.exe caused an Access Violation at location 00402795
>> in module winicon.exe Reading from location 00000008.
>> (no BSOD). Yet the icon displays successfully in 'windows explorer'.
> That's a pretty old version of gimp...
It's a native msw build that was released 2005-03-03: quite old,
I agree. Still, I'm probably not the only person running Cygwin
on a 2005-vintage system, so it's good to isolate the problem...
>> An .ico file actually can cause an application to crash:
>> That tracker says ms planned to patch the problem, but right now
>> I'm using XP SP1, so I wouldn't have that patch.
> Hmmm. Well, the .ico contains the *vista*-approved sizes:
Okay, yet many large-corporation IT departments are sticking
with XP for the foreseeable future, even for brand-new machines.
And apparently the vista-sized icons aren't gracefully ignored
by XP (SP1 at least), no matter what ms may say. BTW, the
graphics drivers on the SP2 machine were current when I checked
them for updates about two weeks ago.
> Supposedly, the 256x256 png-compressed size should be ignored on
> platforms that do not support it -- but maybe that's causing your
> problem. Try the attached version, which omits the 256x256 resolution.
This new .ico works fine in every graphics program I can find,
even on the XP SP1 machine--specifically including the two
programs that failed with the original icon.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple