This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Why do 'find' and 'ls' act differently on ACLs
- From: Steven Monai <steve+cygwin at monai dot ca>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:47:27 -0800
- Subject: Re: Why do 'find' and 'ls' act differently on ACLs
- References: <26250118.post@talk.nabble.com>
aputerguy wrote:
> Why do 'ls and 'find' seem to treat the ACL restrictions differently.
They definitely should not. If they do, then there's a bug to be squashed.
> Specifically, 'ls /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' works
> while 'find /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' returns:
> find: `/c/Documents and Settings/Administrator/': Permission denied
I cannot replicate this behaviour.
Can you provide a minimal test case that reliably demonstrates what
you're seeing? A short script that creates some data, sets some
particular ACLs, and then invokes 'ls' and 'find' would be ideal.
-SM
--
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple