This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:27:30 +0200
- Subject: Re: dg-error vs. i18n?
- References: <4AE235E4.2060005@gmail.com> <84fc9c000910231559y194a9ccfyfb9414f8ed04a361@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910232305540.30905@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4AE24BE4.8020207@gmail.com> <4AE281BC.1040200@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <4a89b8680910240505y73db7b6am9ef0b594e0aaaba2@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Oct 24 07:05, paul.hermeneutic@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:25, Charles Wilson
> <cygwin@cwilson.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > That's interesting. I had thought "ascii" was a fairly common encoding
> > name; I know I've seen both 'encoding="ascii"' and 'encoding="us-ascii"'
> > in XML documents. ?Maybe we (cygwin) should add an explicit
> > plain-old-ascii encoding name?
>
> For XML, the list of encoding values is specified by IANA.
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets
This is something we should head to in the long run. For the time being
I'd prefer we stick to "ASCII".
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple