This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: gdb, insight, and tcltk
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:59:13 -0400
- Subject: Re: gdb, insight, and tcltk
- References: <4ACD0C50.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:46:56PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Since gdb-7.0 was just released, I figure you'll probably be doing a
>cygwin package fairly soon. However, I know you long to drop insight --
>at least to separate it out from gdb proper.
>So, I've got a proposal for you:
>I'll do an insight-only build (sans gdb.exe, gdb-tui.exe) which installs
>into /opt/insight along with the necessary (old) tcltk libs and runtime
>files. It will also install a simple wrapper program as
>/usr/bin/insight.exe that calls /opt/insight/bin/insight.exe and passes
>its arguments, similar to
> exec /opt/insight/bin//insight.exe "$@"
>but it'll be a cygwin exe, so that it's callable directly from windows.
>I'll do a win32 build of the (old) tcltk libs alone, which install into
>the /usr tree, but do NOT include any development files. This will
>serve as the 'upgrade' release for the tcltk package. It will include
>alternatives support for the wish.exe and tclsh.exe progs. This,
>combined with removing the development files, means that the new package
>will (a) allow existing clients like gitk and friends to keep working,
>but (b) won't interfere with any new (X-based) tcl, tk, itcl, itk, and
>To follow somewhat soon, but not immediately, I'll do X-based builds of
>tcl, tk, itcl, itk, and iwidgets, with alternatives support for the
>tclsh.exe and wish.exe progs. (These packages will include -devel
>files). During the interregnum before these X-based packages are
>available, maintainers of packages which are tcl/tk clients -- like gitk
>-- may need to roll back to the (current) tcltk if they need to rebuild,
>since the (new, proposed) tcltk backcompat package won't have the
>(And by "do a build" I mean "permanently adopt") -- and, this is a
>This way, you can release a console-only version of gdb-7.0 at any time,
>without worrying about insight or any of these icky tcltk problems.
>Sound like a plan?
Yes. I am in the process of building gdb.exe but I don't know how much
time I'll have to roll it out. My next 2.5 weeks are pretty booked.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple