This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: BitDefender again
Thanks for the replies...
the suggestion to use a base address in the 0x35000000 area (or indeed
any of the others they mentioned) is going to horribly frag your heap and
your maximum allocatable memory limit, isn't it?
I don't know. How would I tell?
Wonder if it wouldn't work just as well to rebase /their/ DLL?
I don't know. Sounds scary given the liberties an AV program seems to take
with the operating system... Should I try? How would I?
That aside, it sounds like my options are:
(1) Try what they said and see what happens
(2) Run with their "active virus scan" turned off
(3) Change to another AV product (any suggestions? :)
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple