Re: SIGKILL vs. 1.7.0 snapshot

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 02:48:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:36:17PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>I'm not sure in which snapshot this regression crept in, but kill is now having 
>>problems sending SIGKILL:
>>
>>C:\cygwin\bin>.\bash -c 'kill -9 $$'
>>C:\cygwin\bin>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
>>2304
>>C:\cygwin\bin>cd ..\..\cygwin-2\bin
>>C:\cygwin-2\bin>.\bash -c 'kill -9 $$'
>>      1 [sig] bash 3376 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIO
>>LATION
>>  19440 [sig] bash 3376 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to bash.exe.stac
>>kdump
>>C:\cygwin-2\bin>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
>>35584
>
>I introduced the regression.  I'll fix it ASAP.

It should be fixed now.  Hopefully it didn't cause another regression.

The latest snapshot has the fix.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/