This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: tcsh clear command?
Dave Korn wrote:
Like I said - who the hell would do that! ;-)
(<- who the hell would use that!
Anyone who might ever want to pipe stdio between a cygwin and a win32
native program will find it works an awful lot better if they do it in
a DOS console using CYGWIN=notty.
Also, anyone who wants the rows-and-columns based method of copying
text, as opposed to the line-end-wrapping (X-alike) method used in the
Ditto here. Who really prefers a rows-and-columns based method (AKA a
box!) of copying text? I can't say there's been a single time when I
said "Damn I wish I could just copy and paste a box of text. Copying a
line of text just isn't what I want to do right now!". YMMV.
No. That's called your imagination!
Is the implication that you are in some way magic and special and
therefore your personal tastes are somehow objectively valid making
you right about any random topic and anyone else who feels differently
Or do you still accept that this is just a subjective expression of
your tastes, but nonetheless feel that your opinion is of unique and
gripping interest to readers of the list? [*]
It was merely my opinion. Why do you attempt to make more of it?
Somehow I doubt that.
[*] - Note for the sarcasm impaired: This is a rhetorical question.[**]
[**] - Additional note for the sarcasm impaired: "Rhetorical" means it
does not need an answer.
Right, which is why you went through so much effort to type in all those
words explaining this but to which the sarcasm is not the least bit
funny nor witty. No, methinks you were taking a jab and then attempting
to cover it up with a claim of sarcasm and claims of rhetorical questions.
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
If you're living on the edge, make sure you're wearing your seat belt.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html