This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: copying a million tiny files?
- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:55 -0400
- Subject: Re: copying a million tiny files?
- References: <email@example.com> <47294BE7.E195E110@dessent.net>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Brian Dessent wrote:
sam reckoner wrote:
I'm not exaggerating. I have over one million small files that like to
move between disks. The problem is that even getting a directory
listing takes forever.
Is there a best practice for this?
I know it's heresy but if you just want to copy files why not use the
native XCOPY? It will not suffer the performance degredation of having
to emulate the POSIX stat semantics on every file, just like the native
DIR command in a large directory does not take ages because it simply
uses FindFirstFile/FindNextFile which are fairly efficient (but do not
provide sufficient information to emulate POSIX.)
I'm sorry Brian. We put up with allot from you but I think we have to
draw the line at heresy. What is the penalty for heresy around here
anyway? Expulsion? Flogging? Burning at the stake? Whatever it is,
I think we need to make an example of Brian.
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html