This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: FW: Re: [emacs_user@hotmail.com: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: emacs[5172]: GSlice: failed
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:51:00 -0500
- Subject: Re: FW: Re: [emacs_user@hotmail.com: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: emacs[5172]: GSlice: failed
- References: <45D9512C.6000809@swipnet.se>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:26:36AM +0100, Jan Dj??rv wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>If someone is positing that one of several functions possibly isn't
>>working in cygwin why not report exactly which function that would be?
>>I.e., a little more work than reposting speculation would be
>>appreciated.
>
>I did that comment, it is not speculation. I currently have no W32
>machine, hence no cygwin at all.
So if you have no way to verify anything then it sounds like it would be
speculation by definition. Speculation isn't a bad word but speculating
doesn't actually do any good until someone can confirm the speculation.
Since I doubt that anyone here is going to download emacs to satisfy a
speculation that cygwin's API is broken, we obviously need more details
from people who care about this.
i.e.:
>I don't know how the original poster configured Gtk+, I don't know
>which version of cygwin he/she has, I don't know which version of Gtk+
>he/she has. I only tried to find out if Emacs could fix this somehow,
>which it can't. If the original poster (emacs_user@hotmail.com) can
>send in his/hers config.h from the Gtk+ configuration, we can figure
>out what function we are talking about.
So, basically you're saying "a little more work" is required.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/