This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: snapshots: first resort, or last resort?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:51:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: snapshots: first resort, or last resort?
- References: <001201c6945d$59ca3010$0a3b6080@joehome>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Science Guy wrote:
> For a non-expert, such as me, this dichotomy of views is perplexing. This
> is made all the more perplexing because there does not seem to be (I could
> not find) a user-readable list of bugs that each snapshot fixes vis-a-vis
> the latest release. So how would a user know whether the "risky" step of
> installing a snapshot will have any chance of fixing a particular bug?
The reality is probably somewhere in the middle. I admit that I am
enthusiastic about encouraging use of fresh code. However, I have come
to this position from two personal observations -- firstly, that a large
number of problems reported on the list involve already-fixed bugs, and
hence trying a snapshot is a very quick and easy "self serve" method for
resolving a problem you may be having without needing to describe the
problem in detail and hope someone recognises it. Chances are someone
will tell you to try a snapshot anyway, so why not just do it first?
The second is that I myself use freshly compiled code from CVS, and find
it personally to be more stable; or if stable is perhaps not the correct
word, then certainly containing fewer bugs and more features. On
occasion this means experiencing a DLL that is unquestionably broken,
but when this happens I simply copy the previous working one (it helps
to keep a large number of them around.) Again I emphasize all we're
talking about is simply copying a DLL file. In the worst case you can
always just copy back one that you know works -- a release version even,
if you must.
On the other hand, I am experienced with Cygwin and generally know how
to troubleshoot when something goes wrong, so the thought of a
temporarily broken system is of no consequence. It is good that the FAQ
begins with a cautionary note, because it is true that the snapshots
might occasionally be broken, so blindly using one when there is no
observed defect would not be a good idea.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html