This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: 4GB limit on FAT32
- From: Wayne Willcox <wayne at reliant dot immure dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:12:15 -0500
- Subject: Re: 4GB limit on FAT32
- References: <42B1A4B1.1080706@vecernik.at>
- Reply-to: Wayne Willcox <wayne at reliant dot immure dot com>
Not with FAT32 it is not a large file supported filesystem
it is a 32 bit filesystem.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:11:29PM +0200, Oliver Vecernik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just playing with two partitions (m: NTFS, x: FAT32) to check
> whether the 4GB limit is still there:
>
> Admin@t636 ~
> $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/m/size.test bs=100M count=47
> 47+0 Datens"atze ein
> 47+0 Datens"atze aus
> 4928307200 bytes (4.9 GB) copied, 290.58 seconds, 17.0 MB/s
>
> Admin@t636 ~
> $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/x/size.test bs=100M count=47
> dd: Schreiben von "/x/size.test": No space left on device
> 41+0 Datens"atze ein
> 40+0 Datens"atze aus
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 251.469 seconds, 16.7 MB/s
>
> Admin@t636 ~
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 t636 1.5.17(0.129/4/2) 2005-05-25 19:38 i686 unknown
> unknown Cygwin
>
> Obviously it is. Is this the expected behaviour? I thought using SP2 on
> XP eliminates this restriction. Can anybody explain this?
>
>
> Oliver.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Slowly and surely the unix crept up on the Nintendo user ...
Wayne Willcox I will not eat green eggs and ham
wayne@reliant.immure.com I will not eat them Sam I Am!!
A wise person makes his own decisions, a weak one obeys public opinion.
-- Chinese proverb
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/