This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: mkstemp bug
- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g dot r dot vansickle at worldnet dot att dot net>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:39:04 -0500
- Subject: RE: mkstemp bug
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:01:07PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>>So when I say "fifos just barely work" you felt the need
> to inform me
> >>>that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
> how, exactly?
> >>
> >>I did not just tell you that they are broken. I also gave
> you a test
> >>case for FIFOs. I think such a test case is useful for development
> >>and debugging.
> >>
> >
> >Dude, you are just *asking* for one heck of a zinger!
>
> Hey Gary! I'm responding to you again!
>
Oh heavens! I hope its "manic" day! At any rate, I do appreciate the
public, as opposed to private, responses.
> (cue to Gary, in a "Sound Of Music" shot, arms outswept
> singing to the sky)
>
Yeah, don't really get that one, sorry. I hope it isn't important. No
wait, I hope it *is* important, otherwise I'd have to throw a fit because it
was off-topic. No, wait, I mean....
> I'm disappointed.
Well we can't have that! The entire Cygwin project exists explicitly to
*prevent* that! What can I do to sooth your damaged ego, my dear man?
> I sent you the signed photograph that you
> kept pestering me for and I thought that now we'd be internet
> buddies. Was it because I didn't sign it "Hugs and Kisses,
> cgf" as you'd requested?
>
If you aren't just pulling somebody's leg there:
- I never requested any such photograph.
- I never received any such photograph.
- You told me before we were "email enemies" or some gosh dern thing, now
we're "internet buddies"? I frankly don't know what either term is supposed
to mean, but they both sound pretty creepy.
- Didn't this list buy you a new laptop at some point?
- Didn't this list also buy you a hyperthreaded machine a while back?
- Don't you feel even a little sheepish when you repay that with childish
tantrums that aren't even explicable, let alone warranted?
> I guess there just is no way to salve your poor hurt feelings
> and wounded ego
Wait, now it's *me* that's got the wounded ego? I don't follow. I don't do
inexplicable things such as, oh, I don't know, make snide comments when
somebody *agrees* with a statement I make in a cygwin@ post (feel free to
spend hours scouring the archives for evidence to the contrary though, but
don't expect that to ease the pain; for that, I'd simply suggest again that
you get over me).
> and that means another couple of years of
> truly hilarious (and high
> class) references to me in your email.
>
*blush* I do have a way with words, don't I?
Oh, and Chris, seriously, I don't think you should be talking to anybody
about "high class" when you're making smart-a** comments to people who are
doing what they can to help the project. Oh, sorry, "your" project. But
maybe Sam can speak to that better than I - oh I see he has. Never mind.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/