RE: Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-29

["Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>]

----Original Message----
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 20 April 2005 16:37

> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> ----Original Message----
>>> From: Christopher Faylor
>>> Sent: 20 April 2005 15:37
>> 
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> I was planning to look into that for my next patch, as it happens!
>>> 
>>> So were *you* under the impression that you needed a cygwin copyright
>>> assignment to modify setup.exe?  That's not the case, if so.
>> 
>> Umm, no, I was (and still am) under the impression that I need a cygwin
>> assignment on file for contributions to the dll.  I hadn't actually
>> considered what the case was for setup, although the phrase "As per
>> cygwin1.dll:" (apps/setup/README) was somewhat suggestive.  The terms
>> for accepting contributions for both setup and newlib seem somewhat
>> under-documented, or at least I couldn't find them explicitly stated
>> anywhere.
> 
> Well, I'm glad I could clear up your apparent misconception then.
> 
> cgf


  A doco patch would be even nicer :) and save you the time and trouble in
future, no doubt....


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/