This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Bash: when is WinXP not WinXP??
On Oct 12 17:42, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Daniel Miller wrote:
> > I've already had *one* problem to solve under Home, for some reason
> > Executable flags are not set on files that I copy over the network; I
> > didn't even know Windows *had* executable flags, but I'd copy console
> > utilities which worked fine under XPPro (in both Bash and 4NT), but when I
> > copied them to XPHome and tried to run them, I'd get "access denied". I
> > ran 'chmod 777' on these files and they all worked fine after that.
>
> One of the things that MS removed from XP in creating the Home version
> was the ability to modify file ACLs. The "security" properties tab that
> is normally used is absent. I don't know if Windows uses some set of
> default/immutable ACLs under-the-hood, or if they simply removed the
> ability to query and set them from the front-end but left the underlying
> ACL machinery. I suspect the latter. In that case, when you copy files
You're right. Under the hood it's a normal kernel and a normal NTFS.
Just the UI is crippled. From the Cygwin perspective XP home and XP pro
is the same system.
> via native windows methods, who knows what the ACL gets set to, since
> that version of Windows ostensibly does not support that feature at
> all. Apparently since chmod and getfacl/setfacl still work then the low
AFAIR cacls is available also on XP home. But setfacl/getfacl are working
fine, too, if POSIX permission sets are sufficient for you.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/