This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: qmail, DJB licensing
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:22:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: qmail, DJB licensing
- References: <41655E51.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:18:41PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now?
>Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's.
>(i.e. people tend to like it more)
>E.g. sourceware uses qmail
>I see in the thread around
>that qmail has no acceptable license to include it into cygwin,
>because it cannot be guaranteed that it will work reliably on that
>"crappy platform" (simplified). Maybe just with dropping vpopmail support.
>Still the last word?
>Maybe provide a source package only? Igor suggested such a trick, but
>then the thread drifted into something completely different. (RPM
>support, ant, ...)
>Sergey's original porting thread
>also drifted into something completely different. (mysql server)
>Still waiting on DJB's approval?
It's vanishingly unlikely that we'll get DJB's approval.
You might check into how the netqmail does this:
They don't seem to offer binaries, so I assume the licensing problems
Why not concentrate on sendmail or postfix instead? These days, I don't
think qmail has anything over postfix. I use all three and prefer
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html