This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cvs problem under cygwin, cvs documentation
- From: luke dot kendall at cisra dot canon dot com dot au
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:55:28 +1100 (EST)
- Subject: Re: cvs problem under cygwin, cvs documentation
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:33:52PM +1100, luke.kendall wrote:
> >Re-sending this since the Cygwin list says any cross-post means you're
> >a spammer. :-(
>
> You are confused. There is nothing which says that you may not cc another list
> when sending email to the cygwin list. Of course that is acceptable.
My apologies. But I'm still confused in that case, since this is the
response I got from the cygwin list:
On 16 Mar, MAILER-DAEMON wrote:
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sources.redhat.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <cygwincygwin.com>:
> Your message was sent to both the mailing list and a project
> cvs list.
>
> If you are not a "spammer", we apologize for the inconvenience.
> You can add yourself to the cygwin.com "global allow list"
> by sending email *from*the*blocked*email*address* to:
>
> global-allow-subscribe-luke=research.canon.com.au
>
> For certain types of blocks, this will enable you to send email without
> being subjected to further spam blocking. This will not allow you to
> post to a list if you have been explicitly blocked, if you are posting
> an off-topic message, if you are sending an attachment that looks like a
> virus, etc.
>
> Contact cygwin-owner if you have questions about this. (#5.7.2)
>
> --- Enclosed are the original headers of the message.
Could you explain? I would have replied off-list, except I see you
have "From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please>"
I read this comment:
> If you are not a "spammer", we apologize for the inconvenience.
> You can add yourself to the cygwin.com "global allow list"
> by sending email *from*the*blocked*email*address* to:
as meaning it (now) thought I was not subscribed, that I now had a
blocked email address, and that if I wanted to be allowed to post again
I should mail to the given address.
Do you mean that none of those things are true? Perhaps the message
could be clarified?
Regards,
luke
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/