This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Any current plans for an SDL package?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 07:07:44PM -0500, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>While this sounds useful, I don't think it falls in the category of a
>>Cygwin package. Packages offered with setup depend on cygwin1.dll in
>>some form. What you're describing above doesn't fit this mold. I
>>think that's what Chris was trying to point out. This would be a good
>>package for this list to know about even if it doesn't target Cygwin
>That does not make much sense, as AFAIK 'mingw-zlib' does not use
>cygwin1.dll in any way.
>Also by that definition the mingw libraries should not be availible via
>cygwin as they are not intended to be linked with cygwin1.dll
We provided mingw-zlib for a reason. SDL does not fall into that
reason. We are not going to be providing mingw-only libraries in the
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html