This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
- From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit at familiehaase dot de>
- To: Lapo Luchini <lapo at lapo dot it>
- Cc: CygWin <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite
- Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com> <3FA7C328.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gerrit at familiehaase dot de>
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote:
> Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly
>>compared with the STLport library. So it would make sense to use it when
>>performance is an issue.
> I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared.
> (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) )
Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html